as I understand, you intend to engage with THREE characters: “to provide new insights to cultural hybridity, and how new identities, personalities are negotiated between ‘host society’ and ‘homeland’.” then, you identify two basic movements:
I) While some people see this state of being as a positive step in socio-economic terms
II) some define themselves as ‘living in a state of limbo’, confusion, with no fixed cultural identity, and not actually belonging neither ‘here’ nor ‘there’ - a new foreigner to yourself and your homeland, and a ‘constant’ outsider ‘here’…”
why three characters? how will your narrative move beyond illustrating issues above? is split-screen an effective or on obvious strategy in dealing with duality?
